Tuesday, June 07, 2011

Attention and Awareness Aren't The Same



Press Release (Association for Psychological Science)

Paying attention to something and being aware of it seems like the same thing -they both involve somehow knowing the thing is there. However, a new study, which will be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, finds that these are actually separate; your brain can pay attention to something without you being aware that it's there.

"We wanted to ask, can things attract your attention even when you don't see them at all?" says Po-Jang Hsieh, of Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School in Singapore and MIT. He co-wrote the study with Jaron T. Colas and Nancy Kanwisher of MIT. Usually, when people pay attention to something, they also become aware of it; in fact, many psychologists assume these two concepts are inextricably linked. But more evidence has suggested that's not the case.

To test this, Hsieh and his colleagues came up with an experiment that used the phenomenon called "visual pop-out." They set each participant up with a display that showed a different video to each eye. One eye was shown colorful, shifting patterns; all awareness went to that eye, because that's the way the brain works. The other eye was shown a pattern of shapes that didn't move. Most were green, but one was red. Then subjects were tested to see what part of the screen their attention had gone to. The researchers found that people's attention went to that red shape – even though they had no idea they'd seen it at all.

In another experiment, the researchers found that if people were distracted with a demanding task, the red shape didn't attract attention unconsciously anymore. So people need a little brain power to pay attention to something even if they aren't aware of it, Hsieh and his colleagues concluded.

Hsieh suggests that this could have evolved as a survival mechanism. It might have been useful for an early human to be able to notice and process something unusual on the savanna without even being aware of it, for example. "We need to be able to direct attention to objects of potential interest even before we have become aware of those objects," he says.

###

For more information about this study, please contact: Po-Jang Hsieh (Brain & Consciousness Lab) at hsieh.pj@gmail.com.

The APS journal Psychological Science is the highest ranked empirical journal in psychology. For a copy of the article "Unconscious pop-out: Attentional capture by unseen feature singletons only when top-down attention is available" and access to other Psychological Science research findings, please contact Divya Menon at 202-293-9300 or dmenon@psychologicalscience.org.

Sunday, December 12, 2010

毛毛蟲也會尖叫



山胡桃人面蛾的幼蟲會發出尖叫聲來嚇退小鳥?

這種蛾的毛毛蟲幼蟲在受到刺激時,會從身上的氣孔排氣並製造出高頻噪音。黃色林鶯(此毛毛蟲的天敵)聽到後會受驚而逃。

Saturday, December 11, 2010

蟑螂向右轉

研究顯示,蟑螂遇到 型岔路時偏好走右邊(57%),即使剪掉觸角也仍會如此。或許昆蟲的腦部也跟人類一樣有側化的現象?

延伸閱讀:《Cockroaches Prefer Right Turns

Thursday, January 14, 2010

成為階下囚的病毒


總是侵襲細胞的病毒,也有成為階下囚的一天!

大家都知道細胞中的粒線體可能是曾經細菌,它們誤入了細胞但卻因為能夠與細胞彼此互利而被囚禁、保留了下來。近年來有不少研究顯示,人體中有些細胞甚至會捕捉病毒以為己用。

舉例來說,syncytin原本是某種反轉錄病毒的衣殼蛋白,它可以幫助病毒衣殼與細胞膜產生融合。科學家發現胎盤細胞可能捕捉了不少這種反轉錄病毒的基因,並藉此來自己生產syncytin以形成胎盤滋養層,透過這些滋養層,人類的胚胎才能夠從母親身上獲得養份。

這些研究打破了人們的舊觀念,病毒與宿主的關係不再只是單向的利用關係,宿主原來也有機會捕捉病毒以為己用。不過從自私基因的角度來看,成為階下囚的病毒從此就可以無憂無慮的被保留與複製,看起來似乎也是一種不錯的歸宿,。
----------------------------------------------------
<註一>、延伸閱讀:Hunting Fossil Viruses in Human DNA. NYTime.
<註二>、Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. (2000) 403:n785-9. Nature.

Monday, December 28, 2009

天生就愛看臉?


「臉部辨識」(face recognition)的能力是先天的(native)?還是習得的?臉部辨識系統是一套專門處理臉部的系統?還是只是一套專家系統?日本科學家提出證據支持「天生就愛看臉」的假設。

天生就偏好看「臉」:
日本研究人員<註一>把剛出生的猴子養在看不見任何臉的環境中,六個月後讓牠們觀視臉和另一個牠們從未見過的物體(例如汽車),結果發現猴子喜歡看臉。

經驗可影響偏好哪一種「臉」:
接下來的一個月中,其中一組猴子只能見到人臉(人臉組),而另一組只能看到猴臉(猴臉組),然後研究人員便測試牠們會偏好看人臉還是猴臉,結果發現,人臉組偏好看人臉,而猴臉組則偏好看猴臉。

偏好一但在幼時形成,將可維持至成年:
接下來的一年,兩組猴子都進行正常生活(可見到人臉與猴臉),當再次測試時,之前的人臉組仍然偏好看人臉,而猴臉組也仍然偏好看猴臉。

總結:這些證據支持「臉部辨識系統」是一套專門處理臉部的系統,而不是一套專家系統<註二>,而且這種能力的基礎應該是先天就具有的。

-------------------------

<註一>,Sugita, Y. (2008). PNAS.
<註二>,主張「臉部辨識系統」是一套「專家系統」的人認為:「臉」其實沒什麼特別的,只不過是環境中出現最多且最重要的一種東西,為了生存,每個人都必須成為臉部辨識專家,因此腦中的「專家系統」就在負責處理臉部辨識。如果有人是鳥類專家,或汽車達人,則同一個腦區也會對這些事物產生反應。

Saturday, December 26, 2009

螞蟻如何不靠氣味返家?


你以為螞蟻只能依靠氣味來找到回家的路嗎?研究發現,螞蟻找到食物後,可以不經由原路線、並改以直線方式直接返回巢穴。牠們是如何達成這種航向定位(dead reckoning)呢?

科學家發現,螞蟻可能是透過某種「腳步計數」與「路徑方向整合」的方式來定位。也就是說,螞蟻可以透過計算腳步以及整合每一個腳步的方向來達成航向定位。一些證據如下:

1. 如果把直線返家中的螞蟻抓起來移動到別的地方,牠仍會以同樣的直線繼續前進,因而錯失目的地。

2. 如果把螞蟻的腳以人工方式增長,螞蟻返家時會錯算距離而走過頭,相反的,如果以人工方式縮短螞蟻的腳,牠返家時則會在還沒到目的地時就誤以為已經到了。

--------------------------------------------------------------------
<註一>,Shen, J-X. et al. (1998) Animal Behaviour.
<註二>,Wittlinger, M. et al. (2006) Science.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

不行動者,留腦何用?


海鞘」(Turnicates)是一種海中脊索動物,牠屬於尾索動物亞門,其幼蟲擁有簡單的腦與脊索,但當牠找到適當的地點後,牠就會固定生根,並消化掉自己的神經索。

所以有一種說法認為,中樞神經系統最初的主要功能可能是用來行動、以及提供行動所需的各種知覺資訊。當沒有行動的必要時,留腦何用?